Sometimes I really wonder if I contribute to the problem by pointing out the horrible things going on in the world. Shock value diminishes over time, and sometimes I think that by tackling the downside of different issues here, I may be saturating some readers in the process. I certainly hope not! Still, headlines can be indicative of the different turn that events are taking around the globe.
Canadian psych hospital promotes patient sex with private rooms, on-demand porn
There are a lot of good news, too, but one piece of really bad news (or a bizarre incident) can somehow overshadow the positive -- albeit temporarily, of course. Headlines can be shocking, then when you read the report, all you can do most of the time is shake your head, ask "what's the world coming to?" then move on.
First comes gay marriage then comes bestiality in Massachusetts
China moves from bullets to mobile execution vans to improve int'l image
Other times, one can't help but snicker in amusement or probably laugh out loud even. Then what? Remaining passive about these things we read about is an option, of course, but shouldn't bad news move us to act even more? Most of the time, we're in no position to do something about the news we hear of. Maybe not directly.
Berkeley High offers Condom Club
Ad: 'Having sex? Thinking of having sex? Come to room...'
Homosexual gov't minister loaned failed gay porn shop $10,000 taxpayer funds
Maybe these headlines are becoming too much. Or, I'm probably running the risk of making unnatural things and initially repulsive incidents sound natural, acceptable or even attractive in the long run. But that's only for the still media-unsavvy (to make something look ordinary and the most natural thing in the world, bombard the reader/viewer with constant exposure to that which you'd like to seem ordinary and natural). Hopefully, this makes you think about your own awareness (or lack of it) of how you're reacting to the media's manipulation, too.
Sexual affairs between pupils and teachers 'can be beneficial' says UK prof
Animal rights activist: 'Kill the researchers'
Hopefully, too, remaining passive won't be an option for you. That's being part of the problem, not the solution. And nobody would want that.
4 comments:
Solving a problem with another problem won't solve the problem.
Why? What problem do you have in mind that you'll use to try to solve the original problem? Why would you even try to add to the problem?
Long time ago but it is never outdated SUnnyday! thanks for sahring this
Glad to, Rommel! Thanks for dropping by -- daan ka ulit :-)
Post a Comment